Feature comparison
Grace vs. EasyAudit vs. Vanta
This table shows selected public features. Product plans change, so check each provider before you buy.
| Capability | Grace | EasyAudit | Vanta |
|---|---|---|---|
EU AI Act (Annex III, Annex IV, FRIA, CE/EU-DB)Grace focus | |||
NIST AI RMF (Govern / Map / Measure / Manage)Grace focus | partial | ||
Risk-tier classification engineGrace focus | |||
Dual / multi-signer + L0–L4 + segregation of dutiesGrace focus | partial | ||
High-risk evidence = no files stored (BYO-storage)Grace focus | |||
ISO/IEC 42001 (AI management system) | partial | partial | |
SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI | partial | ||
AI policy / document generation | partial | ||
Cross-framework control mapping | partial | ||
Compliance scoring / readiness % | |||
Auto evidence collection (connectors) | |||
Continuous control tests (hourly)listed strength | partial | ||
Trust Center / shareable reportlisted strength | partial | partial | |
Auditor network / handofflisted strength | partial | ||
Our own SOC 2 / ISO certificationlisted strength | partial | ||
Immutable WORM audit trail | partial | partial |
Grace today
EU AI Act risk sorting, saved questions, task tracking, file uploads on paid plans, and dual-signer self-attestation.
Where they win
Other tools may offer more connectors, outside auditors, or security certifications. Check their current sites for details.
Price note
Grace lists monthly self-serve plans and yearly high-risk plans. Ask other providers for their current price.
Competitor data: EasyAudit and Vanta public sites and third-party benchmarks. Directional — confirm pricing with vendors before procurement decisions.