Competitive comparison

Compliance Now vs. EasyAudit vs. Vanta

Competitors lead on security frameworks and connector count. We lead on AI-governance depth, the risk classification engine, accountability model, and high-risk evidence custody — the things they structurally lack.

CapabilityCompliance NowEasyAuditVanta
EU AI Act (Annex III, Annex IV, FRIA, CE/EU-DB)only us
NIST AI RMF (Govern / Map / Measure / Manage)only us
partial
Risk-tier classification engineonly us
Dual / multi-signer + L0–L4 + segregation of dutiesonly us
partial
High-risk evidence = no files stored (BYO-storage)only us
ISO/IEC 42001 (AI management system)
partialpartial
SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI
partial
AI policy / document generation
partial
Cross-framework control mapping
partial
Compliance scoring / readiness %
Auto evidence collection (connectors)
Continuous control tests (hourly)their lead
partial
Trust Center / shareable reporttheir lead
partialpartial
Auditor network / handofftheir lead
partial
Our own SOC 2 / ISO certificationtheir lead
partial
Immutable WORM audit trail
partialpartial
Our wedge

EU AI Act + NIST AI RMF native depth, risk-tier classification, dual-signer accountability, no-file high-risk custody.

Where they win

Vanta's 300+ integrations, 1,200 tests/hour, auditor network, and own certifications. We won't beat that on connector count — we win on data model.

Pricing read

$49–$149/mo matches EasyAudit's band. $15k–$40k+/yr metered on high-risk count sits in Vanta's band. Nobody else meters on risk.

Competitor data: EasyAudit and Vanta public sites and third-party benchmarks. Directional — confirm pricing with vendors before procurement decisions.